RE: [GT] First MAMA-Implementation

["Weigert, Thomas" <weigert AT mst.edu>]

kw,

I notice that you are using a non-standard implementation of the Prices
indicator. I remember that you recently sent in updates to the prices
indicator adding various fields.

I don't think it is that great of an idea to change I:Prices in this
way. I think it would be much better to create a new indicator that
provides mean, etc., as these could be applied to other series than just
the prices series.

Is there any particular reason why you want to extend I:prices in this
manner?

Thanks, Th.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: kw [mailto:gt
AT
netsrak.net]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2008 9:27 AM
> To: devel
AT
geniustrader.org
> Subject: Re: [GT] First MAMA-Implementation
> 
> opps ... found a silly mistake in the Hilbert-transform and added a
> direct start now ... additionally I wrote to Mr. Ehlers to get his
> recommendations for initialization.
> 
> 
> On Tue, 2008-03-04 at 12:29 +0100, kw wrote:
> > Following Ehlers Book "Rocket Science for Traders" I implemented a
first
> > version of his MAMA ... again the problem of proper indicator
> > initialization. Right now I would call its status "alpha".
> > I wrote it without knowing the I:G::Container module.
> > Thats why there is no calculate routine.
> > I post it anyways cause it is working and it's way of programming
might
> > be an option for quick-testing EasyLanguage coded TradeStation
> > indicators which can almost be copied line by line due to the
fifo-lists
> > I employed.
> >
> > regards,
> >
> > K.