Re: [GT] DSS [fixed]

["Robert A. Schmied" <ras AT acm.org>]

Weigert, Thomas wrote:
> The original version documented the smooth-before-divide version, while
> it implemented the divide-before-smooth version.

no actually that helps -- the original dss was so messed up it looses
all rights to the name dss. the latest version (i do hope i've kept them
all straight) is (will soon become) the gt dss indicator.

and if i can figure out which one is the best divide-before-smooth version
i will likely name it (well something else, i hadn't figured that out before
starting to write ...) maybe dss_wlab.

yell, anyone, if i'm wasting my time and the 'other' scheme is useful
enough to save, rename and maintain ...

aloha

ras

> So I guess this is not much help, as it is not clear whether it wanted
> to implement the former but did not get it right, or whether the
> documentation got later added incorrectly...
>
> Th.
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Robert A. Schmied [mailto:ras
AT
acm.org]
> > Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2008 11:52 PM
> > To: devel
AT
geniustrader.org
> > Subject: Re: [GT] DSS [fixed]
> >
> >
> > ok -- so now
> >
> > 1a) is the www.wealth-lab.com form useful for ta purposes?
> > 1b) not being able to decipher it myself, which version did the
>
> original
>
> > dss package
> >    attempt to implement? might that fact give that version name
> > precedence, even
> >    if it didn't work?
> > 1c) if not we need new name(s) for it. one for file and another for
> > indicator (package).
> >
> > 2a) is the pre 11mar08 dss.pm correct in terms of the
>
> www.wealth-lab.com
>
> > version?
> > 2b) if not someone want to make it so?
> >
> >
> >
> > ras