Re: [GT] trunk/GT/Tools.pm 2008-03-30 04:07:51 UTC (rev 594) or later

["Robert A. Schmied" <ras AT acm.org>]

Weigert, Thomas wrote:
> Other than the DB open/close issue, what changes do you feel

i'm still working on them. but the priorities are very fluid and
my pet efforts (latest were naming/id'ing scan.pl sig-sys-descs which
quickly involved the system alias business in Tools.pm take priority,
followed by a users plea for assistance.

i'm still unsure why you felt it necessary to clobber the object
aliases as hard as you did. but i haven't evaluated it at all yet.

and i don't know what unintended consequence(s)
foreach (@options) {
   my ($key, $value) = split (/=/, $_);
   GT::Conf::set($key, $value);
}
is going to have in the scripts

> unwise/unnecessary? I have posted proposals every time before I made a

well with less than a fortnight between a set of diffs and a commit
i'd say it's too fast. and i don't recall seeing many diff sets
prior to a commit.

bear in mind that users need time to review the changes, apply the
patch and maybe merge in some of their changes too. that takes time.

> change, with very little response by the community, by the way...

i'm still trying to get a handle on most of the material changes ...

aloha

ras

> Th.
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Robert A. Schmied [mailto:ras
AT
acm.org]
> > Sent: Saturday, May 03, 2008 11:47 AM
> > To: devel
AT
geniustrader.org
> > Subject: Re: [GT] trunk/GT/Tools.pm 2008-03-30 04:07:51 UTC (rev 594)
> > or later
> >
> > yes absolutely the case -- some of the changes you've made have been
> > viewed by me to be unwise or maybe simply unnecessary so i'm still
> > operating on a baseline about 3 months old.