[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [GT] Problem with display_indicator/EMA/revision 599



João,
 
I do not quite agree.
 
While you are right that 2 years is inappropriate for intraday data, 200 periods is not appropriate for weekly or monthly data either.
 
There are probably many more users using GT for daily or longer periods than for intaday periods, so we should cater to that population first. We could also decide that there are different defaults depending on the time frame, maybe 2 years for timeframes day and longer, and 2 days for timeframes shorter than one day? Or something else...
 
Th.

________________________________

From: João Costa [mailto:joaocosta
AT
zonalivre.org]
Sent: Fri 7/25/2008 9:48 AM
To: devel
AT
geniustrader.org
Subject: Re: [GT] Problem with display_indicator/EMA/revision 599




point #1 is still a problem when dealing with intra day data and i'd
like to change that to the previous behavior unless you or someone has
a good reason not to.


<<winmail.dat>>