[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[GT] Re: Re: Re: Re: EMA incorrect when using --nb-item
- To: devel
AT
geniustrader.org
- Subject: [GT] Re: Re: Re: Re: EMA incorrect when using --nb-item
- From: Nick Fantes Huege <nfhuege
AT
gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2010 22:58:45 +0300
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=Ei6GIBKGso5taY66Z2hh2PJpOlE6zSwNqf+PQzyq9jU=; b=ivJ95TRKiXiVunditMB7xx0XvSiyRgfLbILL5TCU6bNUyInYa/IElLwKG/ZiOCeTms aEnMzR9uFGZsvLF+TMQJ2QKEyVqtdIwrEsiH4yGHh5fujRmAAJn0XeNk8pFmp8OMXGJz 8FsvvZpvP96uJxptbTXiP7iKprDX+9rqz9eDQ=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=Fl0bTSNyuBSoLStv6v4LPmmhdJ3R/A7Yd5zN85cBQj97ql0RNxj5smXpjU4VR1LOaW 6SMoQU9dWX5e1IyxEx6vErn55okkuCsbFoUTrwja2eD/hivnPvoBiatbF+zlBVrcDdxw UB2EEhTfy6cwq116vpQAkOb4Qs4LQX5T18Gc0=
- In-reply-to: <4C487E75.4080805
AT
acm.org>
- Message-id: <AANLkTikOxJ1OvMtgR-ll4njRK4CDwhszmU2xU1QWsoT5@mail.gmail.com> (sfid-20100722_220002_478607_22588D25)
- Reply-to: devel
AT
geniustrader.org
I did some more testing with --nb-item, but I only got more confused.
I think we should not use it at all. It seems, as RAS said, it is only
useful in graphic.pl, but it can be specifically added there.
I would even go further as to suggest its complete removal from
Tools::find_calculator, to avoid any confusion and wrong results, but
I guess that may be a bit too harsh.
Regards,
Nick